![Keener v. People](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Keener v. People](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Keener v. People
572 P.2D 463, 194 COLO. 244, 1977.CO.40057
-
- 4,00 kr
-
- 4,00 kr
Publisher Description
The majority has treated this case as requiring resolution of the broad question of whether "an admission by the defendant at an earlier hearing in a contempt proceeding" is admissible in a subsequent criminal action. The narrow question presented is whether prejudicial error resulted, in a criminal case, from the trial courts admission of the defendants prior statements regarding the income listed on his 1973 W-2 tax forms.