![Lack v. Sullivan](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Lack v. Sullivan](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Lack v. Sullivan
959 F.2d 240 (9th Cir. 04/14/1992)
-
- 4,00 kr
-
- 4,00 kr
Publisher Description
Lack appeals the district courts dismissal of his complaint appealing the decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services that Lack is not entitled to disability insurance or Supplemental Security Income (SS1). We affirm.