Lackey v. Cook Lackey v. Cook

Lackey v. Cook

1979.NC.41210 40 N.C. APP. 522; 253 S.E.2D 335

    • 4,00 kr
    • 4,00 kr

Publisher Description

The primary issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment against the plaintiffs on the grounds that their claims are barred by statutes of repose, G.S. 1-50(5) and G.S. 1-50(6). Summary judgment is appropriate only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Vassey v. Burch, 301 N.C. 68, 72, 269 S.E.2d 137, 140 (1980). Whether a statute of repose has expired is strictly a legal issue, Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp., 308 N.C. 419, 425, 302 S.E.2d 868, 871-72 (1983), and if the pleadings or proof show without contradiction that it has expired, then summary judgment may be granted.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1979
3 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
51.3
KB

More Books by Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Powell v. S & G Prestress Co. Powell v. S & G Prestress Co.
1994
Kraft Foodservice Inc. v. Hardee Kraft Foodservice Inc. v. Hardee
1994
State v. Legrande State v. Legrande
1968
Grant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. Grant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
1968
Wm. Muirhead Construction Co. v. Housing Authority Wm. Muirhead Construction Co. v. Housing Authority
1968
Bost v. Citizens National Bank Bost v. Citizens National Bank
1968