Porter v. Shah

606 F.3D 809, 109 FAIR EMPL.PRAC.CAS. (BNA) 653, 93 EMPL. PRAC. DEC. P 43,901, 2010.CDC.0000080

    • 4,00 kr
    • 4,00 kr

Publisher Description

Melvin Porter appeals the district courts grant of summary judgment to the defendant on his 14-count complaint alleging various acts of retaliation and race and sex discrimination by his employer, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Porter v. Fulgham, 601 F. Supp. 2d 205 (D.D.C. 2009) (Porter II Mem. Op.). We affirm the courts judgment on Counts I-IV because we agree that Porter failed to rebut USAIDs legitimate reasons for not promoting him to two positions, Counts VIII and X based on res judicata and Count XII because the alleged retaliatory performance assessment did not constitute a materially adverse employment action. We reverse the district courts judgment on Counts V and VI because a reasonable juror could conclude that Porter was substantially more qualified for the position of Deputy Chief in the Personnel Operations Division than the person selected to fill it and on Count XIV because the unfavorable interim performance assessment of Porter was a materially adverse employment action.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2010
1 June
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
18
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
65.4
KB

More Books by Arizona Court of Appeals

2010
2010
2010
2009
2009
2009