[U] Cincinnati Insurance Co. V. Van Lanen [U] Cincinnati Insurance Co. V. Van Lanen

[U] Cincinnati Insurance Co. V. Van Lanen

    • 4,00 kr
    • 4,00 kr

Publisher Description

¶1. David Van Lanen, Richard Otradovec, and Buildtec, LLC, appeal a summary judgment declaring that Regent Insurance Company has no duty to defend Buildtec and Otradovec against Van Lanen's third-party complaint. The appellants contend the circuit court erroneously construed the complaint and therefore erroneously concluded Regent had no duty to defend. Regent, in advocating affirmance of the circuit court's decision, contends the economic loss doctrine precludes Van Lanen's claims.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2004
3 August
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
16
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
71.5
KB

More Books by State of Wisconsin in Court of Appeals District III

Nco Portfolio Management Nco Portfolio Management
2008
State v. Hassel State v. Hassel
2005
Mair v. Trollhaugen Ski Resort Mair v. Trollhaugen Ski Resort
2005
Village of Hobart v. Brown County Village of Hobart v. Brown County
2004
Linden v. Cascade Stone Co. Inc. Linden v. Cascade Stone Co. Inc.
2004
[U] Walczak V. Kum And Go [U] Walczak V. Kum And Go
2007