Vandevander v. Propst

Per Curiam: Lee Hull Vandevander appeals from the district court's entry of judgment in favor of Defendants, following a jury trial, and denial of his ""Post Motion""1 in Vandevander's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action.2 Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Vandevander v. Propst, No. CA-89-97-E-K (N.D.W. Va. May 15, 1992; June 9, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.