Veazie Bank v. Fenno
75 U.S. 533, 1869.SCT.0000025
-
- 4,00 kr
-
- 4,00 kr
Publisher Description
Mr. Hoar, Attorney-General of the United States, argued the case fully, contra; he relying upon the case of Hylton v. The United States,2 as conclusive of the question independently of principle; and referring to the brief recently published3 of General Hamilton, by whom the case was argued, to explain and support his view of what was there decided; a case confirmed recently, the Attorney-General observed, in Pacific Insurance Company v. Soule.4 In reply, it was contended that Hylton v. The United States adjudged one point alone, which was that a tax on carriages was not a direct tax, and that from the dicta of the judges, in the case, it was obvious that the great question of what were direct taxes was but crudely considered.
More Books by United States Supreme Court
Hammond Et Al. v. Mason and Hamlin Organ Company
1875
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Evidence Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure and Appellate Procedure 2023
2023