W R G Const. Co. v. Hoebel W R G Const. Co. v. Hoebel

W R G Const. Co. v. Hoebel

600 P.2D 334, 1979 OK 125, 1979.OK.0040268

    • 4,00 kr
    • 4,00 kr

Publisher Description

1 Under the provisions of H.B. No. 1353, Ch. 217, O.S.L. 1976, p. 337, 85 O.S.Supp. 1976 ?? 5 -7 an employee refused to be retained or rehired because he/she "has in good faith filed a [compensation] claim" may seek, inter alia, "reasonable damages" resulting from the employers wrongful discharge. The narrow issue presented in this proceeding is whether the right to damages for the discharge made wrongful by the cited act is redressible in a district court suit or must be litigated as part of the employees compensation claim. We assume original jurisdiction under Art. 7, ? 4 , Okl. Con., to settle this first-impression question and hold that rights created by H.B. No. 1353 are cognizable only in a district court action.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1979
11 September
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
7
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
59.5
KB

More Books by Oregon Supreme Court

Central Catholic Education Association v. Archdiocese of Portland Central Catholic Education Association v. Archdiocese of Portland
1996
State v. Lhasawa State v. Lhasawa
2002
Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores
2003
In re Meyer In re Meyer
1999
In re Conduct of Stauffer In re Conduct of Stauffer
1998
In re Gustafson In re Gustafson
1998