Wanex v. Provident State Bank of Preston Wanex v. Provident State Bank of Preston

Wanex v. Provident State Bank of Preston

1983.MD.40365 53 MD. APP. 409; 454 A.2D 381

    • 4,00 kr
    • 4,00 kr

Publisher Description

The American Psychiatric Association has declared, in clear and unmistakable terms, that sexual intimacies between a psychiatrist and his or her patient are unethical and forbidden. As noted by L. Jorgenson, R. Randles, and L. Strasburger, The Furor Over Psychotherapist-Patient Sexual Contact: New Solutions To An Old Problem, 32 Wm. and Mary L.Rev. 645, 647 (1991), the import of this ethical injunction, and others like it, is a clarion proclamation that "Its Never O.K." And yet, unfortunately, it occurs. According to Mr. James J. Homer, it occurred between the defendant, S. Eugene Long, M.D., and Mr. Homers wife, Vicki Homer, and it led, ultimately, to the breakup of the Homer marriage. He seeks damages from Dr. Long for breach of contract, negligence, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1983
6 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
12
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
68.7
KB

More Books by Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Wyatt v. Johnson Wyatt v. Johnson
1995
Caldwell v. Caldwell Caldwell v. Caldwell
1995
Jensen v. Jensen Jensen v. Jensen
1995
Security Management Corp. v. Baltimore County Security Management Corp. v. Baltimore County
1995
Kulbicki v. Maryland Kulbicki v. Maryland
1994
Needle v. White Needle v. White
1990