O'Connor Et Al. v. City Brockton O'Connor Et Al. v. City Brockton

O'Connor Et Al. v. City Brockton

MA.24 , 30 N.E.2d 842, 34 (1941)(308 Mass)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

QUA, Justice. This petition is brought under G.L.(Ter.Ed.) c. 71, § 34, as amended by St.1939, c. 294. The amended section reads in part as follows: 'Every city and town shall annually provide an amount of money sufficient for the support of the public schools as required by this chapter. Upon petition to the superior court, sitting in equity, against a city or town, brought by ten or more taxable inhabitants thereof, or by the mayor of a city, or by the attorney general, alleging that the amount necessary in such city or town for the support of public schools as aforesaid has not been included in the annual budget appropriations for said year, said court may determine the amount of the deficiency, if any, and may order such city and all its officers whose action is necessary to carry out such order, or such town and its treasurer, selectmen and assessors, to provide a sum of money equal to such deficiency, togethe r with a sum equal to twenty-five per cent thereof.' Then follow provisions for obtaining the money by taxation or borrowing, and the section closes with this sentence: 'Said court may order that the sum equal to the deficiency be appropriated and added to the amounts previously appropriated for the school purposes of such city or town in the year in which such deficiency occurs and may order that the amount in excess of the deficiency be held by such city or town as a separate account, to be applied to meet the appropriation for school purposes in the following year.' The allegations of the petition, omitting statements of law, are in substance these: The petitioners are ten taxable inhabitants of Brockton. That city has adopted a 'Plan B' charter [see G.L.(Ter.Ed.) c. 43, §§ 56-63]. Prior to the submission by the mayor to the city council of the annual budget for 1940 the school committee requested the mayor to include therein an additional sum of $4,000 necessary to pay an increase which had been voted by the school committee in the salaries of school janitors. The mayor refused to include this additional amount in the budget submitted, and the budget was passed by the council and approved by the mayor without including this additional sum. The school committee has requested of the mayor a supplementary appropriation to pay the salary increase, but he has refused to present any such supplementary appropriation to the city council. 'That the amount of money appropriated by said city of Brockton for the support of the public schools of said city in the year 1940 is insufficient for the support of said public schools as required by chapter 71 of the General laws.' The prayers are in accordance with the amended section 34.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1941
4 de enero
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
5
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
65.6
KB

Más libros de Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Tufts v. Waltham Auto Bus Co. Et Al. Tufts v. Waltham Auto Bus Co. Et Al.
1930
Fitzgerald v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co. Fitzgerald v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co.
1931
Sparrow Chisholm Co. v. City Boston Sparrow Chisholm Co. v. City Boston
1951
Roberts v. Eastland Food Products Co. Roberts v. Eastland Food Products Co.
1948
Commonwealth v. Rivers Commonwealth v. Rivers
1948
Sherrer v. Sherrer Sherrer v. Sherrer
1946