O''neal v. Merkel O''neal v. Merkel

O''neal v. Merkel

78 F.3d 579, 1996.C04.46124

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Per Curiam: The notice of appeal in this case was received in the district court shortly after expiration of the appeal period. Under Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 101 L. Ed. 2d 245, 108 S. Ct. 2379 (1988) and Fed. R. App. P. 4(c), the notice is considered filed as of the date Appellant delivered it to prison officials for forwarding to the court. The record does not reveal when Appellant delivered the notice of appeal for mailing to the court. Accordingly, we remand the case for the district court to obtain this information from the parties and determine the timeliness of the filing under Houston v. Lack and Rule 4(c). The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1996
4 de marzo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
1
Página
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
46.8
KB

Más libros de Fourth Circuit U.S. Court Of Appeals

Moody v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. Moody v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.
1995
United States v. Beafore United States v. Beafore
1996
Cranfill v. Winston-Salem Housing Authority Cranfill v. Winston-Salem Housing Authority
1996
United States v. Zervos United States v. Zervos
1996
Shelton v. United States Shelton v. United States
1996
Jones v. Sprint International Jones v. Sprint International
1996