Backlund V. University Of Washington Backlund V. University Of Washington

Backlund V. University Of Washington

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

We are asked to apply Washington's informed consent law for health care patients, RCW 7.70.050, in a case where the Backlunds allege Dr. Craig Jackson committed malpractice while he was employed by the University of Washington (University). They contend he was negligent in continuing to treat Ashley Backlund's jaundice at birth with phototherapy. They argue he should have abandoned phototherapy, a more conservative form of treatment for jaundice, or applied it in conjunction with a transfusion of Ashley's blood, a riskier procedure. A jury, however, exonerated Dr. Jackson and the University from any negligence in the decision to continue phototherapy instead of transfusing the baby. Now, the Backlunds complain Dr. Jackson and the University failed to provide them sufficient information upon which to make an informed health care choice, thus violating RCW 7.70.050, subjecting Dr. Jackson and the University to liability despite their exoneration from liability for negligence.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1999
8 de abril
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
33
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
73.8
KB

Más libros de Washington Supreme Court

Wr Enterprieses, Inc. v. Department of Labor and Industries Wr Enterprieses, Inc. v. Department of Labor and Industries
2002
Besel v. Viking Insurance Company of Wisconsin Besel v. Viking Insurance Company of Wisconsin
2002
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.
2000
State v. Tilton State v. Tilton
2003
State v. Lopez State v. Lopez
2002
Viereck v. Fibreboard Corp. Viereck v. Fibreboard Corp.
1996