Radinsky v. Karras

In this malpractice action, following a jury trial and verdict for defendant, the trial court granted plaintiff a new trial. Suusequently, plaintiff, upon motion, was granted permission to file an amended complaint and an answer to defendants counterclaim for his fee and was granted a continuance. The amended complaint was filed, and defendant filed his answer on June 7, 1971. Duuing the succeeding year, neither party took any action of record in the case.