![Rathbun v. Robson](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Rathbun v. Robson](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Rathbun v. Robson
661 P.2D 850, 203 MONT. 319, 1983.MT.0000074
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
This case comes from the District Court of the Fourteenth Judicial District, County of Musselshell. Plaintiff commenced this action seeking a judgment declaring him to be the holder of an easement across property owned by defendants. At the trial court, and in this Court, two easement theories were presented; easement by prescription, and easement by necessity. The District Court held against plaintiff in both instances. Additionally, we are asked to decide whether the court erred in verbatim adoption, and by photographic reproduction, the defendants findings of fact - Page 321 and conclusion of law.