![Aster Kirk v. Pineville Mobile Homes](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Aster Kirk v. Pineville Mobile Homes](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Aster Kirk v. Pineville Mobile Homes
1983.WV.35, 310 S.E.2D 210, 172 W.VA. 693
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
2. "Annoyance and inconvenience can be considered as elements of proof in measuring damages for loss of use of real property." Syllabus Point 3, Jarrett v. E. L. Harper & Son, Inc., 160 W.Va. 399, 235 S.E.2d 362 (1977).