![Bartley v. Chicago and Eastern Illinois](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Bartley v. Chicago and Eastern Illinois](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Bartley v. Chicago and Eastern Illinois
1942.IN.30083; 41 N.E.2D 805; 220 IND. 354
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Chicago & E.I.R. Co. (1940), 216 Ind. 512, 24 N.E.2d 405. In the second trial, after both parties had presented all their evidence, appellees motion for a directed verdict in their favor was sustained and the jury returned such a verdict.