Darwin E. Neibarger and Wife v. Universal Darwin E. Neibarger and Wife v. Universal

Darwin E. Neibarger and Wife v. Universal

1992.MI.1211 , 486 N.W.2D 612, 439 MICH. 512

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

We granted leave to consider the applicability in these consolidated cases of the "economic loss doctrine," which bars tort recovery and limits remedies to those available under the Uniform Commercial Code where a claim for damages arises out of the commercial sale of goods and losses incurred are purely economic. If plaintiffs in these cases are limited by the doctrine to a warranty action governed by the UCC and its four-year statute of limitations, which recognizes no discovery rule, their claims are time-barred.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1992
20 May
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
44
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
85.7
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Melvin S. Waltz State v. Melvin S. Waltz
1952
Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary
1943
C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T
1938
Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine
1931
State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V. State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V.
1930
Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing
1982