Elmer Charles Sartain v. Fidelity Elmer Charles Sartain v. Fidelity

Elmer Charles Sartain v. Fidelity

1989.ID.15201 775 P.2D 161; 116 IDAHO 269

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

The appellant, Marc Aaron Mitchell, challenges the sufficiency of the trial evidence to support a jury verdict finding him guilty of delivery of a controlled substance. The substance delivered during the transaction in question was not recovered by the police and therefore was not identified by chemical analysis. We hold that circumstantial evidence indicating that the delivered substance was methamphetamine was sufficient to support the verdict, and we therefore affirm the judgment of conviction.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1989
5 June
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
57.4
KB

More Books by Court of Appeals of Idaho

Donald O. Olson v. Idaho State University Donald O. Olson v. Idaho State University
1994
James R. Brinton and Patricia J. Brinton James R. Brinton and Patricia J. Brinton
1994
State v. Downing State v. Downing
1996
State v. Pilik State v. Pilik
1996
J.P. Stravens v. City of Wallace J.P. Stravens v. City of Wallace
1996
State Idaho v. Steven Lee Hyde State Idaho v. Steven Lee Hyde
1995