![Emran Riaz Imami v. Saima Imami](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Emran Riaz Imami v. Saima Imami](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Emran Riaz Imami v. Saima Imami
1991.FL.48160 ; 584 SO. 2D 596; 16 FLA. LAW W. D 1987
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Blaine and Scott Crosby challenge the amount of restitution the lower court imposed after their pleas of nolo contendere to grand theft. They assert that the trial court erred in determining the amount of each victims loss and in setting a restitution figure in excess of their ability to pay. We agree with both contentions and reverse.
More Books by First District Court of Appeal of Florida
James M. Dawson and Veldina Dawson v. Ncnb National Bank Florida
1991
Arand Construction Co. v. Duford Dyer
1991
Robert A. Riedel v. Ncnb National Bank Florida
1991
Danny Foote and Betty J. Foote v. Green Tree Acceptance
1991
O'Kon and Company v. Robert A. Riedel
1991
Sandra M. Marlowe v. Dogs Only Grooming and Travelers Insurance Company
1991