![Engebretsen V. Fairchild Aircraft Corp.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Engebretsen V. Fairchild Aircraft Corp.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Engebretsen V. Fairchild Aircraft Corp.
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff David Engebretsen appeals the judgment entered after a jury verdict for defendant Fairchild Aircraft Corporation in this airplane products liability action. On appeal, plaintiff first argues that the District Court erred in denying his motion for judgment as a matter of law. Further, plaintiff argues that the District Court erroneously denied his motion for a new trial because of the admission of two reports by defendant's expert witnesses that contained inadmissible and prejudicial hearsay; the admission of expert testimony regarding post-incident tests; and the District Court's refusal to admit certain government reports offered by plaintiff. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.