![English v. Pabst Brewing Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![English v. Pabst Brewing Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
English v. Pabst Brewing Co.
1987.C04.40559 828 F.2D 1047
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
C. M. English was employed by the Pabst Brewing Company as a sales representative. In February of 1982, Pabst informed English that his employment was to be terminated. English sued under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendant because English did not file his ADEA charge within the 180 day period imposed by the statute and because he failed to establish that the termination was based on his age. C. M. English v. Pabst Brewing Co., 645 F. Supp. 186 (W.D.N.C. 1986). We affirm.