Equal Opportunity Commission State Equal Opportunity Commission State

Equal Opportunity Commission State

1977.NE.115 , 251 N.W.2D 730, 198 NEB. 104

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

The question in this case is whether section 48-1008, R. R. S. 1943, a part of the Act Prohibiting Unjust Discrimination in Employment Because of Age, limits the right of the Equal Opportunity Commission to bring suit on behalf of the aggrieved employee to a 30-day period following filing of the complaint by the employee, or whether the elapse of the 30-day period is simply a condition precedent to the right of the aggrieved employee to bring an action on his own behalf. The District Court for Douglas County held that the commissions action in this case was barred by a 30-day statute of limitation, sustained the defendant employers demurrer to the petition of the commission, and dismissed the action. The commission appeals to this court. We reverse and remand because we are convinced that the controverted provision of section 48-1008, R. R. S. 1943, is not a statute of limitation.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1977
23 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
7
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
62.4
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Nebraska

Rosemary Schieffer v. Catholic Archdiocese Rosemary Schieffer v. Catholic Archdiocese
1993
City of Gordon v. Montana Feeders City of Gordon v. Montana Feeders
2007
State Nebraska v. Arthur Lyle State Nebraska v. Arthur Lyle
1994
Ervin Melcher v. Bank Madison Ervin Melcher v. Bank Madison
1995
Bridgette A. Anderson and Candy S. Bridgette A. Anderson and Candy S.
1995
Heath Consultants v. Precision Instruments Heath Consultants v. Precision Instruments
1995