Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co‪.‬

1972.NC.40247 16 N.C. APP. 194; 192 S.E.2D 113

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

At the outset, it is important to emphasize that Lorm and Marl were closely-held corporations in which all three defendants were shareholders, directors and officers. The two corporations were formed at the same time with the same purpose -- to establish the Port O Call Restaurant. The corporations had interlocking directorates with the three defendants firmly in control of both corporations. Plaintiff sued the three defendants in their capacities as shareholders, directors and officers of both corporations. Because of the multiple relationships shared by the three defendants with the two corporations, references to all of the defendants in the pleadings and testimony are difficult, but not impossible, to keep straight. However inartfully the pleadings are drawn, the complaint does sufficiently allege a claim for relief against the three individual defendants, against Lorm and against Marl.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1972
25 October
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
14
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
78.9
KB

More Books by Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Powell v. S & G Prestress Co. Powell v. S & G Prestress Co.
1994
Kraft Foodservice Inc. v. Hardee Kraft Foodservice Inc. v. Hardee
1994
State v. Legrande State v. Legrande
1968
Grant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. Grant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
1968
Wm. Muirhead Construction Co. v. Housing Authority Wm. Muirhead Construction Co. v. Housing Authority
1968
Bost v. Citizens National Bank Bost v. Citizens National Bank
1968