![Gem Jewelry Company Beaumont v. C. H. Nolte Et Ux.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Gem Jewelry Company Beaumont v. C. H. Nolte Et Ux.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Gem Jewelry Company Beaumont v. C. H. Nolte Et Ux.
1960.TX.40579; 335 S.W.2D 766
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Appellees have filed an able and earnest motion and amended motion for rehearing herein. They urge that this court erred in holding that the evidence raised the issues: (1) whether Mrs. Nolte bought the ring, and (2) whether, if she bought the ring, she was acting as the agent or had authority of her husband to do so.