George Lindsey v. Honorable Jack Oneill George Lindsey v. Honorable Jack Oneill

George Lindsey v. Honorable Jack Oneill

1985.TX.40576; 689 S.W.2D 400, 28 TEX. SUP. J. 341

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

This is an original mandamus action brought by George Lindsey and Betty Lindsey, individually and as next friends of their son, Thomas Daniel Lindsey, to compel Judge ONeill to rescind his order limiting the scope of their Second Amended Notice of Deposition. This court has jurisdiction over this cause pursuant to TEX. REV. CIV. STAT. ANN. art. 1733 (Vernon Supp. 1985). Because we believe the trial courts order improperly restricted the scope of discovery as defined by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, we conditionally grant the writ.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1985
3 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
4
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
67.2
KB

More Books by Fourteenth District, Houston Court of Appeals of Texas

Larry Michael Hoffman v. State Texas Larry Michael Hoffman v. State Texas
1994
Philip Woods Moore v. State Texas Philip Woods Moore v. State Texas
1983
Harris County Bail Bond Board v. Carol Burns Harris County Bail Bond Board v. Carol Burns
1994
Charles L. Krull and Xavier Improvement Company v. Eduardo Somoza Charles L. Krull and Xavier Improvement Company v. Eduardo Somoza
1994
Michael King & Lydia King v. John O. Bishop Michael King & Lydia King v. John O. Bishop
1994
Ronald Gaile Stephens v. Turtle Creek Apartments Ronald Gaile Stephens v. Turtle Creek Apartments
1994