George R. Arnott v. John Mataya George R. Arnott v. John Mataya

George R. Arnott v. John Mataya

1993.C08.41026 ; 995 F.2D 121

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

This is an appeal from the district courts denial of a motion for summary judgment for claims brought against police officers John Mataya and Greg Connolly under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for false arrest and use of excessive force. Mataya and Connolly moved for summary judgment on two grounds: (1) they are entitled to qualified immunity; and (2) they had probable cause to arrest plaintiff, thereby barring a suit for false arrest. The district court determined that genuine issues of material fact existed and denied the motion. We affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1993
28 May
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
60.6
KB
United States v. Alexander United States v. Alexander
2005
United States v. Johnson United States v. Johnson
2005
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
2005
Lyons v. Luebbers Lyons v. Luebbers
2005
United States v. Thomas United States v. Thomas
2005
[U] United States v. Franklin [U] United States v. Franklin
2005