![Harkness v. Harkness](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Harkness v. Harkness](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Harkness v. Harkness
227 MICH.APP. 581, 577 N.W.2D 116, 1998.MI.427
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
When interpreting contingent fee agreements, we construe ambiguous terms against the drafting attorney in the absence of a clear showing that the parties had a contrary intent.