Harkness v. Harkness Harkness v. Harkness

Harkness v. Harkness

227 MICH.APP. 581, 577 N.W.2D 116, 1998.MI.427

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

When interpreting contingent fee agreements, we construe ambiguous terms against the drafting attorney in the absence of a clear showing that the parties had a contrary intent.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1998
30 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
18
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
58.7
KB

More Books by Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Compeau People v. Compeau
2001
People v. Pesquera People v. Pesquera
2001
Nations Banc Mortgage Corporation of Georgia v. Luptak Nations Banc Mortgage Corporation of Georgia v. Luptak
2000
People v. Canales People v. Canales
2000
Bell v. Seabury Bell v. Seabury
2000
People v. Woods People v. Woods
2000