Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.

Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co‪.‬

54 Ohio St.2d 64, 375 N.E.2d 46, OH.40058(1978)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

The appositeness of rendering a summary judgment hinges upon the tripartite demonstration: (1) that there is no genuine issue
as to any material fact; (2) that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; and (3) that reasonable minds
can come to but one conclusion, and that conclusion is adverse to the party against whom the motion for summary judgment is
made, who is entitled to have the evidence construed most strongly in his favor.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1978
19 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
3
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
61.5
KB

More Books by The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio

Franchise Developers, Inc. v. Cincinnati Franchise Developers, Inc. v. Cincinnati
1987
Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Antonelli Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Antonelli
1987
Pitts v. Cincinnati Met. Housing Auth. Pitts v. Cincinnati Met. Housing Auth.
1953
In re Pottery In re Pottery
1954
State Ex Rel Sanor Sawmill, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio State Ex Rel Sanor Sawmill, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
2004
State v. Doe State v. Doe
2004