![Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.
54 Ohio St.2d 64, 375 N.E.2d 46, OH.40058(1978)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
The appositeness of rendering a summary judgment hinges upon the tripartite demonstration: (1) that there is no genuine issue
as to any material fact; (2) that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; and (3) that reasonable minds
can come to but one conclusion, and that conclusion is adverse to the party against whom the motion for summary judgment is
made, who is entitled to have the evidence construed most strongly in his favor.