Kight v. Singletary Kight v. Singletary

Kight v. Singletary

50 F.3D 1539, 1995.C11.42241

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Jorge Luis Alzate was convicted of possessing and importing cocaine, and he has never denied doing it. At trial, his sole defense was duress. On two occasions while evidence was being presented, the prosecutor made certain representations detrimental to Alzates duress defense. Before the case was submitted to the jury, the prosecutor learned that his representations had been false, but he failed to correct them. Because the prosecutors failure to correct his false representations could have affected the jurys verdict, we reverse the denial of Alzates new trial motion.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1995
15 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
23
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
61.9
KB

More Books by Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta
1993
Davis v. Great Western Bank Davis v. Great Western Bank
1993
Wiley v. Thomas Wiley v. Thomas
1993
Arlook v. Lichtenberg Arlook v. Lichtenberg
1992
Cumberland Memorial Gardens v. Roberts Cumberland Memorial Gardens v. Roberts
1992
In re a & B Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. In re a & B Heating & Air Conditioning Inc.
1989