Kim v. State Kim v. State

Kim v. State

181 S.W.3D 448, 2005.TX.0008285

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Kim has now filed additional papers challenging his conviction asserting the trial court lacked jurisdiction and arguing, based on Ex parte Seidel, that he can appeal a trial courts lack of jurisdiction at any time. Kim is wrong. For at least three reasons, we do not have jurisdiction of his appeal, and we dismiss it.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2005
2 November
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
4
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
48.8
KB

More Books by Court of Appeals Second District of Texas Fort Worth

In re Estate of Iversen In re Estate of Iversen
2004
Calstar Properties, L.L.C. v. City of for Worth Calstar Properties, L.L.C. v. City of for Worth
2004
Morales v. Simuflite Training International Morales v. Simuflite Training International
2004
Samuels-Wickman v. Dep't of Public Safety Samuels-Wickman v. Dep't of Public Safety
2003
Johnson v. State Johnson v. State
2003
Ex Parte Primrose Ex Parte Primrose
1997