Parminter v. State Parminter v. State

Parminter v. State

762 SO.2D 966, 762 SO.2D 966, 2000.FL.0045627

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

In this appeal James R. Parminter asserts that the trial court committed three errors. His first contention-that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the charge of possession of cocaine-is without merit, and we affirm his conviction. His second and third contentions are that the trial court erred in revoking his probation and in sentencing him on the cocaine charge. We reverse on those grounds.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2000
31 May
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
2
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
49.3
KB

More Books by Florida Court of Appeal

City of Margate v. Singh City of Margate v. Singh
2001
Levesque v. State Levesque v. State
2001
Henderson v. State Henderson v. State
2001
Weir v. State Weir v. State
2001
Ruiz v. Brink's Home Security Ruiz v. Brink's Home Security
2001
State Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Sarnoff State Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Sarnoff
2000