Parminter v. State
762 SO.2D 966, 762 SO.2D 966, 2000.FL.0045627
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
In this appeal James R. Parminter asserts that the trial court committed three errors. His first contention-that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the charge of possession of cocaine-is without merit, and we affirm his conviction. His second and third contentions are that the trial court erred in revoking his probation and in sentencing him on the cocaine charge. We reverse on those grounds.