Salazar v. Lopez Salazar v. Lopez

Salazar v. Lopez

88 S.W.3d 351, 2002.TX.0004955

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Frank Salazar sued Sheriff Oscar Lopez, Jr. ("Lopez") and Jim Wells County ("County"), claiming that he was terminated from employment for the refusal to perform an illegal act. Salazar contended that he had a valid claim under the Sabine Pilot exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. See Sabine Pilot Serv., Inc. v. Hauck, 687 S.W.2d 733 (Tex. 1985). The trial court found that Lopez and the County were immune from suit and granted a plea to the jurisdiction. The issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court had the inherent power to exercise jurisdiction over Salazars claim. Because we conclude that the trial court was without jurisdiction to consider Salazars claim, we affirm the trial courts order.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2002
7 August
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
3
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
48.5
KB

More Books by Texas Court of Appeals

Guevara v. State Guevara v. State
1999
Hendrickson v. Swyers Hendrickson v. Swyers
1999
Gonzales v. State Gonzales v. State
1999
Eubanks v. State Eubanks v. State
1999
City of Harlingen v. Estate of Sharboneau City of Harlingen v. Estate of Sharboneau
1999
Atlas Capital Corp. v. Virani Atlas Capital Corp. v. Virani
1999