Schlage Lock Company v. Whyte Schlage Lock Company v. Whyte

Schlage Lock Company v. Whyte

CA.0008375 (2002)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

In this opinion, we reject the inevitable disclosure doctrine. We hold this doctrine is contrary to California law and policy
because it creates an after-the-fact covenant not to compete restricting employee mobility.
.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2002
12 September
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
30
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
75.7
KB

More Books by In the Court of Appeal of the State of California Fourth Appellate District Division Three

Mw. Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental and Metal Works Company Mw. Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental and Metal Works Company
2004
People v. Carrillo People v. Carrillo
2004
Metcalf v. U-Haul International Metcalf v. U-Haul International
2004
Steven F. v. Anaheim Union High School District Steven F. v. Anaheim Union High School District
2003
Mosby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. Mosby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
2003
People v. Martinez People v. Martinez
2002