Security State Bank v. Burk Security State Bank v. Burk

Security State Bank v. Burk

100 WASH.APP. 94, 995 P.2D 1272, 2000.WA.0042441, 41 UCC REP.SERV.2D 319

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

RCW 62A.9-504(3) of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) requires a creditor to dispose of a defaulting debtors collateral in a commercially reasonable manner. We hold that an Article 9 guarantor may assert noncompliance with this requirement as an affirmative defense to a creditor action to enforce the guaranty, notwithstanding the guarantors waiver of defenses arising out of the creditors unjustified impairment of the collateral. Because the guarantors here, Fred and Randelle Burk, raised an issue of material fact as to creditor Security State Banks commercially reasonable disposition of the debtors collateral, we reverse the summary judgment in favor of the Bank and remand for trial.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2000
24 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
12
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
63.6
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Wyoming

Roemer Oil Co. v. Aztec Gas & Oil Corp. Roemer Oil Co. v. Aztec Gas & Oil Corp.
1994
Amoco v. Bd. of Com'Rs of Carbon County Amoco v. Bd. of Com'Rs of Carbon County
1994
Smith, Keller & Assoc. v. Dorr & Assoc. Smith, Keller & Assoc. v. Dorr & Assoc.
1994
Wyoming Coalition v. Game & Fish Com'n Wyoming Coalition v. Game & Fish Com'n
1994
Boyd v. State Boyd v. State
1987
Davis v. Consolidated Oil & Gas Davis v. Consolidated Oil & Gas
1990