Tacoma Athletic Club Inc. V. Indoor Comfort Systems Inc. Tacoma Athletic Club Inc. V. Indoor Comfort Systems Inc.

Tacoma Athletic Club Inc. V. Indoor Comfort Systems Inc‪.‬

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

WIGGINS, J. -- Appellant Indoor Comfort Systems (Comfort Systems) sold and installed a dehumidification system for Tacoma Athletic Club (the Club) . The trial court found that Comfort Systems breached the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose and awarded damages to the Club under Washington's version of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Comfort Systems argues that the UCC does not apply because this was a construction contract instead of a sale of goods. We adopt the "predominant factor" test used in most jurisdictions and hold that this was a sale of goods because the predominant aspect of this contract was a sale of goods, not the rendition of services. We hold, however, that the trial court used an improper measure of damages and we reverse and remand for recomputation of damages.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1995
14 September
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
17
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
77.3
KB

More Books by Division Two Court of Appeals of Washington

Vancouver School District No. 37 v. Service Employees International Union Vancouver School District No. 37 v. Service Employees International Union
1996
Herring v. Department of Social and Health Services Herring v. Department of Social and Health Services
1996
In re Marriage of Dugan-Gaunt In re Marriage of Dugan-Gaunt
1996
Mailloux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. Mailloux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
1995
In re Marriage of Kastanas In re Marriage of Kastanas
1995
Willis v. Simpson Investment Co. Willis v. Simpson Investment Co.
1995