Teisinger v. Hardy Teisinger v. Hardy

Teisinger v. Hardy

5 P.2D 219, 91 MONT. 9, 1931.MT.0000123

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Quieting Title ? Complaint ? Fraudulent Mortgage ? Evidence ? Sufficiency ? Equity ? Pleading ? Reply ? Departure ? Appeal ? Law of Case. Mortgages ? Fraudulent Assignment After Payment ? Lien Extinct. 1. Where a mortgage has been fully paid, its subsequent assignment with intent to defraud creditors does not keep the lien thereof alive. Same ? Quieting Title ? Complaint ? When Sufficient. 2. The complaint in an action to quiet title alleging ownership and right of possession in plaintiff, and that defendant claims some right therein which is groundless and invalid, is sufficient. Pleading ? Function of Reply ? Reply cannot Aid Complaint. 3. The office of a reply is to join issue on, or avoid new matter alleged in, the answer; it cannot aid the complaint by supplying an omission broadening its scope or adding a new ground of relief. Same ? Quieting Title ? When Reply not Departure from Cause of Action Stated in Complaint. 4. Plaintiff in an action to quiet title, not being advised as to the nature of the claim defendant may assert to the property in

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1931
18 November
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
18
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
60.4
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Montana

Janssen v. Best & Flanagan Janssen v. Best & Flanagan
2005
Groundwater v. Wright Groundwater v. Wright
1979
Schneeman v. Dept. of Labor & Industry Schneeman v. Dept. of Labor & Industry
1993
State v. Lemieux State v. Lemieux
2007
State Ex Rel. forsyth v. District Court State Ex Rel. forsyth v. District Court
1985
Brungard v. Riskys Inc. Brungard v. Riskys Inc.
2007