Tiebout Goes Global: International Migration As a Tool for Voting with Your Feet (Symposium) Tiebout Goes Global: International Migration As a Tool for Voting with Your Feet (Symposium)

Tiebout Goes Global: International Migration As a Tool for Voting with Your Feet (Symposium‪)‬

Missouri Law Review, 2008, Fall, 73, 4

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Publisher Description

I. INTRODUCTION Students of federalism have long recognized that citizens in a federal system can "vote with their feet" by moving from one jurisdiction to another. (1) Those oppressed or harmed by the policies of one regional government can improve their lot by moving to another. Such "exit rights" are an important alternative to traditional "voice"-based political participation through voting. (2) In a classic 1956 article, Charles Tiebout pointed out that foot voting can also help citizens find jurisdictions that more closely approximate their preferred mix of taxes and public services. (3) While foot voting cannot work perfectly so long as there are moving costs, (4) it does enable many people to choose which jurisdiction to live in and thereby decide which policies they wish to live under.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2008
22 September
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
31
Pages
PUBLISHER
University of Missouri-Columbia School of Law
SIZE
289.9
KB

More Books by Missouri Law Review

Using Judicial Performance Evaluations to Supplement Inappropriate Voter Cues and Enhance Judicial Legitimacy (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems) Using Judicial Performance Evaluations to Supplement Inappropriate Voter Cues and Enhance Judicial Legitimacy (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)
2009
Comments on the White, Caufield, And Tarr Articles (Response to Articles in This Issue, P. 573, 605, 635) (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems) Comments on the White, Caufield, And Tarr Articles (Response to Articles in This Issue, P. 573, 605, 635) (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)
2009
Hostile Takeover: The State of Missouri, The St. Louis School District, And the Struggle for Quality Education in the Inner-City: Board of Education of the City of St. Louis V. Missouri State Board of Education. Hostile Takeover: The State of Missouri, The St. Louis School District, And the Struggle for Quality Education in the Inner-City: Board of Education of the City of St. Louis V. Missouri State Board of Education.
2009
The Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan: The Least Political Method of Selecting High Quality Judges (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems) The Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan: The Least Political Method of Selecting High Quality Judges (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)
2009
The Foreclosure Purchase by the Equity of Redemption Holder Or Other Junior Interests: When Should Principles of Fairness and Morality Trump Normal Priority Rules?(Symposium: A Festschrift in Honor of Dale A. Whitman) The Foreclosure Purchase by the Equity of Redemption Holder Or Other Junior Interests: When Should Principles of Fairness and Morality Trump Normal Priority Rules?(Symposium: A Festschrift in Honor of Dale A. Whitman)
2007
The Missouri Plan in National Perspective (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems) The Missouri Plan in National Perspective (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)
2009