Tipping Point, Over the Top, Or Just Noncompliance As Usual?(Essays) Tipping Point, Over the Top, Or Just Noncompliance As Usual?(Essays)

Tipping Point, Over the Top, Or Just Noncompliance As Usual?(Essays‪)‬

The Hastings Center Report, 2008, March-April, 38, 2

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Publisher Description

As soon as I read the headline, I thought, here we go again. As a former director of the Office for Human Research Protections at the Department of Health and Human Services, I was hardly surprised when several colleagues sent me the op-ed by Atul Gawande in the New York Times last December called "A Lifesaving Checklist." (1) Dr. Gawande, a surgeon at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston and staff writer at the New Yorker, suggested that the federal agency responsible for protection of human subjects in research had gone too far--over the bureaucratic edge. Perhaps he was right, but his representation of the facts was not, as OHRP was quick to point out in a statement of its own. (2) OHRP's statement did not evoke the energetic public response that Gawande's did, but then facts have a way of being complicated and nuanced, making drama a bit harder.

GENRE
Science & Nature
RELEASED
2008
1 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
Hastings Center
SIZE
159.4
KB

More Books by The Hastings Center Report

Medicine's Duty to Treat Pandemic Illness: Solidarity and Vulnerability: Most Accounts of Why Physicians Have a Duty to Treat Patients During a Pandemic Look to the Special Ethical Standards of the Medical Profession. An Adequate Account Must Be Deeper and Broader: It Must Set the Professional Duty Alongside Other Individual Commitments and Broader Social Values. Medicine's Duty to Treat Pandemic Illness: Solidarity and Vulnerability: Most Accounts of Why Physicians Have a Duty to Treat Patients During a Pandemic Look to the Special Ethical Standards of the Medical Profession. An Adequate Account Must Be Deeper and Broader: It Must Set the Professional Duty Alongside Other Individual Commitments and Broader Social Values.
2009
Clinical Ethics Consulting and Conflict of Interest: Structurally Intertwined: Clinical Ethical Consultants are Subject to an Unavoidable Conflict of Interest. Their Work Requires That They be Independent, But Incentives Attached to Their Role Chip Relentlessly at Independence. This is a Problem Without Any Solution, But It can at Least be Ameliorated Through Careful Management. Clinical Ethics Consulting and Conflict of Interest: Structurally Intertwined: Clinical Ethical Consultants are Subject to an Unavoidable Conflict of Interest. Their Work Requires That They be Independent, But Incentives Attached to Their Role Chip Relentlessly at Independence. This is a Problem Without Any Solution, But It can at Least be Ameliorated Through Careful Management.
2007
Are Alcoholics Less Deserving of Liver Transplants? when Does Behavior Trigger a Lesser Claim to Medical Resources? when Does Chronic Drinking, For Example, Mean That One has a Lesser Claim to a Liver Transplant? Only when One's Behavior Becomes a Callous Indifference to Others' Needs--when One Knows the Consequences of Heavy Drinking and Knows That by Drinking One May End up Depriving Someone else of a Liver. Are Alcoholics Less Deserving of Liver Transplants? when Does Behavior Trigger a Lesser Claim to Medical Resources? when Does Chronic Drinking, For Example, Mean That One has a Lesser Claim to a Liver Transplant? Only when One's Behavior Becomes a Callous Indifference to Others' Needs--when One Knows the Consequences of Heavy Drinking and Knows That by Drinking One May End up Depriving Someone else of a Liver.
2007
Will New Ways of Creating Stem Cells Dodge the Objections? Will New Ways of Creating Stem Cells Dodge the Objections?
2005
Pushing Right Against the Evidence: Turbulent Times for Canadian Health Care. Pushing Right Against the Evidence: Turbulent Times for Canadian Health Care.
2007
A Suicide Right for the Mentally Ill? A Swiss Case Opens a New Debate. A Suicide Right for the Mentally Ill? A Swiss Case Opens a New Debate.
2007