Vonville Et Al. v. Dexter Et Al. Vonville Et Al. v. Dexter Et Al.

Vonville Et Al. v. Dexter Et Al‪.‬

1948.IN.30044; 77 N.E.2D 759; 118 IND. APP. 187

In Banc Appellate Court of Indiana
    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

ROYSE, Judge. The appellee, in his petition for rehearing, says that in our opinion we have transgressed the well-established rule that an appellate tribunal cannot weigh the evidence and thereby substitute its decision for that of the trial court. He bases his contention on the answer the husband made to certain questions propounded by appellees attorney at the conditional examination of the husband before the Referee in Bankruptcy for the Northern District of Indiana in the matter of the husbands bankruptcy. These questions and answers are as follows:

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1948
5 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
7
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
56.7
KB

More Books by In Banc Appellate Court of Indiana

Eilts v. Moore Eilts v. Moore
Eilts v. Moore
1946
Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Noll Et Al. Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Noll Et Al.
Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Noll Et Al.
1945
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Review Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Review
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Review
1954
Rosen v. Alexander Et Al. Rosen v. Alexander Et Al.
Rosen v. Alexander Et Al.
1951
Continental Optical Co. v. Reed Continental Optical Co. v. Reed
Continental Optical Co. v. Reed
1949
Daugherty Et Al. v. Daugherty Et Al. Daugherty Et Al. v. Daugherty Et Al.
Daugherty Et Al. v. Daugherty Et Al.
1949