Voting with Your Feet is No Substitute for Constitutional Rights (Twenty-Seventh Annual National Federalist Society Student Symposium) Voting with Your Feet is No Substitute for Constitutional Rights (Twenty-Seventh Annual National Federalist Society Student Symposium)

Voting with Your Feet is No Substitute for Constitutional Rights (Twenty-Seventh Annual National Federalist Society Student Symposium‪)‬

Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 2009, Wntr, 32, 1

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Publisher Description

I. THE DOWNSIDE OF VOTING WITH YOUR FEET The organizers of this Symposium (1) gave each panel a brief summary of the panel's intended topic. I want to take a part of that summary as the subject of my commentary: "It is a benefit of Federalism that people can vote with their feet and migrate to communities that share their values as well as enable their liberty. But does pervasive judicial review threaten to destroy local identity by homogenizing community norms?" (2) There follows some more in that vein, some illustrative examples, and finally the provocative question whether the Constitution really requires a separation of God and football. (3) I will return to God and football, but I principally want to address this idea of voting with your feet. The idea is common in the federalism literature, (4) but it has always troubled me. (5)

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2009
1 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
29
Pages
PUBLISHER
Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
SIZE
306
KB

More Books by Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy

Social Welfare, Human Dignity, And the Puzzle of What We Owe Each Other. Social Welfare, Human Dignity, And the Puzzle of What We Owe Each Other.
2003
Resisting the Ratchet. Resisting the Ratchet.
2008
The Conservative Case for Precedent. The Conservative Case for Precedent.
2008
An Empirical Analysis of Life Tenure: A Response to Professors Calabresi & Lindgren (Response to Steven G. Calabresi and James Lindgren, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. Vol. 29, P. 769, 2006) An Empirical Analysis of Life Tenure: A Response to Professors Calabresi & Lindgren (Response to Steven G. Calabresi and James Lindgren, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. Vol. 29, P. 769, 2006)
2007
Market Rights and the Rule of Law: A Case for Procedural Constitutionalism. Market Rights and the Rule of Law: A Case for Procedural Constitutionalism.
2003
Ending the war on Terrorism One Terrorist at a Time: A Noncriminal Detention Model for Holding and Releasing Guantanamo Bay Detainees (Twenty-Fourth Federalist Society Student Symposium, Law and Freedom) Ending the war on Terrorism One Terrorist at a Time: A Noncriminal Detention Model for Holding and Releasing Guantanamo Bay Detainees (Twenty-Fourth Federalist Society Student Symposium, Law and Freedom)
2005