- 0,99 €
Descripción de la editorial
A jury found appellant, Pablo Cienfuegos, guilty of the offense of capital murder. *fn1 Because the State did not seek the death penalty, the trial court automatically assessed appellant's punishment at confinement for life. *fn2 In ten points of error, *fn3 appellant contends that the trial court erred in admitting, over his objection, hearsay testimony; the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support his conviction; the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress identification evidence in violation of his constitutional rights to due process *fn4 and due course of law; *fn5 his conviction for capital murder under the conspiracy theory of the law of parties *fn6 violated his constitutional rights to due process and due course of law; and the mandatory imposition of a life sentence upon his conviction for capital murder under the conspiracy theory of the law of parties violated his constitutional rights against cruel and unusual punishment. *fn7 We affirm.