In re Marshall In re Marshall

In re Marshall

392 F.3d 1118, 2005 Daily Journal D.A.R. 36, 44 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 14, 5 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8, C09.0001601(2004)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descripción editorial

The surviving spouse alleges that E. Pierce Marshall tortiously interfered with an expected inter vivos gift from the decedent.
Three courts-the Texas probate court, the U.S. bankruptcy court and the U.S. district court-have rendered conflicting judgments
that decide the claims of the surviving spouse and that affect the distribution of the net property of the decedent's trust
and probate estate.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2004
30 de diciembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
41
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
INFORMACIÓN DEL PROVEEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
76,8
KB
Hilao v. Estate of Ferdinand Marcos Hilao v. Estate of Ferdinand Marcos
1996
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association
1983
United States v. Cochrane United States v. Cochrane
1993
Buono v. Norton Buono v. Norton
2004
United States v. Navidad-Marcos United States v. Navidad-Marcos
2004
United States v. Joyce United States v. Joyce
2004