In re Scott In re Scott

In re Scott

CA.0000796 (2003)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descripción editorial

Petitioner James Robert Scott seeks relief on habeas corpus from the judgment of death entered against him in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. A747321. We affirmed that judgment on direct appeal. (People v. Scott (1997) 15 Cal.4th 1188 (Scott).) In this matter, we issued an order to show cause based on allegations that (1) trial counsel failed to investigate and to adequately present a mental defense at the guilt phase, (2) trial counsel failed to investigate and to adequately present mitigating evidence at the penalty phase, and (3) these failures rendered counsel's advice to waive a jury uninformed and hence ineffective. We appointed the Honorable Howard J. Schwab, Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, as our referee, and directed him to take evidence and make findings of fact on specified questions. Judge Schwab has done so and has issued a report responding to the questions. We adopt the referee's factual findings. In accordance with those findings, we also conclude petitioner has failed to carry his burden of establishing ineffective assistance of counsel. Accordingly, we discharge the order to show cause and, in a separate order, deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2003
27 de enero
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
73
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
INFORMACIÓN DEL PROVEEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
82,1
KB
Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.
2005
In re Marriage of Goddard In re Marriage of Goddard
2004
Graham v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation Graham v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation
2004
People v. Laino People v. Laino
2004
People v. Cochran People v. Cochran
2002
People v. Garcia People v. Garcia
2002