Mitchell V. Esparza Mitchell V. Esparza

Mitchell V. Esparza

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descripción editorial

The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the grant of habeas relief to respondent Gregory Esparza after concluding that, because the Eighth Amendment requires the State to narrow the class of death eligible defendants, the Ohio Court of Appeals had improperly subjected respondent's claims to harmless-error review. 310 F. 3d 414 (2002). This decision ignores the limits imposed on federal habeas review by 28 U. S. C. §2254(d), and we therefore grant the petition for certiorari and reverse.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2003
3 de noviembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
9
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
TAMAÑO
64,9
KB
At&T Technologies v. Communications Workers America Et Al. At&T Technologies v. Communications Workers America Et Al.
1986
Resource Technology v. Fisher Scientific Resource Technology v. Fisher Scientific
1996
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3 United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 1/3 United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 1/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 2/3 United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 2/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 18 Crimes And Criminal Procedure Volume 2/2 United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 18 Crimes And Criminal Procedure Volume 2/2
2024