Raphael v. Bloomfield Raphael v. Bloomfield

Raphael v. Bloomfield

113 CAL.APP.4TH 617, 6 CAL.RPTR.3D 583, 68 CAL. COMP. CASES 1680, 3 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 10,109, 2003.CA.0010822

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descripción editorial

After the Employment Development Department (the EDD) paid temporary unemployment compensation disability (UCD) benefits to a disabled worker, it filed a lien claim for reimbursement from the employers insolvent workers compensation carrier. California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) assumed the insolvent carriers obligations, but refused to satisfy the EDDs lien. CIGA argued it is only required to pay a "covered claim" and the EDDs lien is an obligation to a state that is excluded from the definition of "covered claims." (Ins. Code, § 1063.1, subd. (c)(4).) The Workers Compensation Appeals Board (the Board) ruled against CIGA, reasoning that reimbursement of the EDDs lien is a payment to the particular disabled workers account, not to the EDD.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2003
21 de noviembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
18
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
INFORMACIÓN DEL PROVEEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
66,5
KB
Norcal Mutual Insurance Company v. Newton Norcal Mutual Insurance Company v. Newton
2000
People v. Crayton People v. Crayton
1999
Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400 Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400
1999
Ali v. City of Los Angeles Ali v. City of Los Angeles
1999
County of Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles County of Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles
1999
County of Orange v. Carl D. County of Orange v. Carl D.
1999