Stanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 1 - January 2012 Stanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 1 - January 2012

Stanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 1 - January 2012

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descripción editorial

A leading law journal features a digital edition as part of its worldwide distribution, using quality ebook formatting and active links. This current issue of the Stanford Law Review contains studies of law, economics, and social policy by recognized scholars on diverse topics of interest to the academic and professional community.


Contents for this issue include:


"The Right Not to Keep or Bear Arms"

Joseph Blocher


 "The Ghost That Slayed the Mandate"

Kevin C. Walsh


 "State Sovereign Standing: Often Overlooked, but Not Forgotten"

Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, E. Duncan Getchell, Jr., & Wesley G. Russell, Jr.


 "Establishing Official Islam? The Law and Strategy of Counter-Radicalization"

Samuel J. Rascoff


 "Lobbying, Rent-Seeking, and the Constitution"

Richard L. Hasen


 Note: "Bringing a Judicial Takings Claim"

Josh Patashnik


The Stanford Law Review was organized in 1948. Each year the Law Review publishes one volume, which appears in six separate issues between January and July. This volume represents the 2011-2012 academic year. Each issue contains material written by student members of the Law Review and outside contributors, such as law professors, judges, and practicing lawyers. The journal is edited by students at Stanford Law School. 


In the ebook edition, all the footnotes, graphs, and tables of contents (including those for individual articles) are fully linked, properly scalable, and functional; the original note numbering is retained. Also, the URLs in notes are active; and the issue is properly formatted for ereaders. Six previous issues from the 2010-2011 academic year (Volume 63) are also available as ebooks.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2012
23 de febrero
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
282
Páginas
EDITORIAL
Quid Pro Books
TAMAÑO
653
KB

Más libros de Stanford Law School

Stanford Law Review Stanford Law Review
2012
What Judges Think of the Quality of Legal Representation. What Judges Think of the Quality of Legal Representation.
2011
Evidence, Procedure, And the Upside of Cognitive Error. Evidence, Procedure, And the Upside of Cognitive Error.
2004
The Rise and Fall of the WASP and Jewish Law Firms. The Rise and Fall of the WASP and Jewish Law Firms.
2008
Transparency is the Solution, Not the Problem: A Reply to Bruce Green (Response to Article in This Issue, P. 1605) Transparency is the Solution, Not the Problem: A Reply to Bruce Green (Response to Article in This Issue, P. 1605)
2008
Stanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 6 - June 2012 Stanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 6 - June 2012
2012