U.S. v. Miele U.S. v. Miele

U.S. v. Miele

989 F.2D 659, 1993.C03.41243

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descripción editorial

In this appeal under the Sentencing Guidelines, the defendant Anthony Miele challenges the district courts attribution of drug quantity, which was the basis under the Guidelines for determining the length of his sentence. In view of the numerous inconsistencies in the record, the fact that the source of most of the critical evidence was an addict-informant with an impaired memory, and the lack of any findings by the district court other than a single conclusory finding as to drug quantity, we find that the record as it now stands does not meet the Guidelines "sufficient indicia of reliability" standard, see U.S.S.G. § 6A1.3. We will therefore vacate Mieles sentence and remand for further proceedings (development of the record, more detailed fact finding, et alia).

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1993
22 de marzo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
23
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
TAMAÑO
61,3
KB

Más libros de United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Pennsylvania Protection and Advocacy, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare Pennsylvania Protection and Advocacy, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
2005
Major League Umpires Association v. American League of Professional Baseball Clubs Major League Umpires Association v. American League of Professional Baseball Clubs
2004
United States v. Lennon United States v. Lennon
2004
Egervary v. Young Egervary v. Young
2004
Josey v. John R. Hollingsworth Corp. Josey v. John R. Hollingsworth Corp.
1993
Partnership v. Commercial Asset Trust I (Cat) Partnership v. Commercial Asset Trust I (Cat)
1993