G. Stefane Millhouse Ii v. Ronald G. Wiesenthal G. Stefane Millhouse Ii v. Ronald G. Wiesenthal

G. Stefane Millhouse Ii v. Ronald G. Wiesenthal

1989.TX.40591; 775 S.W.2D 626, 32 TEX. SUP. J. 332

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

This case presents the question of whether the determination of causation in an appellate legal malpractice case is a question of law or a question of fact. This is an issue of first impression in Texas. G. Stefane Millhouse II brought suit against his former attorney, Ronald G. Wiesenthal, for damages caused by Wiesenthals failure to timely file a statement of facts with the court of appeals in an earlier case in which Wiesenthal had represented Millhouse. The trial court granted Wiesenthals motion for summary judgment, concluding as a matter of law that Wiesenthals failure to file the statement of facts in the earlier case was not the cause of Millhouses loss of that case on appeal. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 757 S.W.2d 103. We affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1989
19 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
66.8
KB

More Books by Supreme Court Of Utah

Benny Fatt v. Utah State Tax Commission Benny Fatt v. Utah State Tax Commission
1994
Emerald Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission Emerald Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission
1954
Dillon Smith v. Utah Central Credit Union Dillon Smith v. Utah Central Credit Union
1986
Kirchgestner v. Denver & Rio Grande Kirchgestner v. Denver & Rio Grande
1951
Richard Rousay v. Board Review Industrial Richard Rousay v. Board Review Industrial
1987
Utah Power and Light Company v. Public Utah Power and Light Company v. Public
1985