Gayle v. Hamm Gayle v. Hamm

Gayle v. Hamm

1972.CA.40524; 25 CAL. APP. 3D 250; 101 CAL. RPTR. 628

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Petitioners Mary Gayle and Steven J. Stone (proponents) filed an initiative petition with defendant Robert L. Hamm, County Clerk of the County of Ventura (county clerk) pursuant to Elections Code section 3706 on April 12, 1971. Upon advice from the county counsel that the initiative measure (ordinance), even if carried at the polls, would be invalid, the county clerk refused to examine the petition for requisite signatures as prescribed by Elections Code section 3707. Proponents then filed a petition for a writ of mandate in the superior court, on June 23, 1971, to compel the county clerk to examine and process the petition in accordance with said section 3707. Defendant county clerk and the County of Ventura (county) interposed demurrers to the petition on the grounds that it failed to state a cause of action and that there was a defect of parties defendant in failing to name the county as a party.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1972
28 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
14
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
60.9
KB

More Books by Second Appellate District, Division Five Court of Appeal of California

Kazerouni v. Satnick Kazerouni v. Satnick
1991
People v. Harris People v. Harris
1991
People v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County People v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
1991
People v. Keele People v. Keele
1986
In re Arlene Kimie Naito on Habeas Corpus In re Arlene Kimie Naito on Habeas Corpus
1986
People v. Hatcher People v. Hatcher
1995