M.I.F. Securities Company Et Al. v. R.C. Stamm & Co‪.‬

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed,
with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (94 A.D.2d 211)
except so much thereof as holds that the individual members of Stamm partnership may not demand arbitration between MIF and
Stamm partnership, an issue which we deem it unnecessary to reach or consider.